Programme overview
What the official source supports
A broad reconstructive-surgery research pathway with a cleft and craniofacial component comprising approximately 10–20% of the experience. ASCFS lists Amy S. Xue and Michael Klebuc; only Klebuc is added here because the reviewed materials do not yet establish which Amy Xue is meant.
Programme faculty
Meet the published team
Official portrait unavailable in reviewed evidence
Michael Klebuc
Research mentor (ASCFS listing)
Houston Methodist Hospital — Institute for Reconstructive Surgery
Official programme or society training listing ↗Profile reviewed 23 Oct 2026
Profile page →Training structure
Published areas of exposure
- Focused research with the listed mentor; project scope must be agreed with the programme
Eligibility
Who should verify their fit
The reviewed listing does not provide programme-specific prerequisite qualifications; confirm with the named host
Application
Published application route
Contact the named programme contact for project availability, application requirements and timing; listing does not guarantee a vacancy
A programme-specific document checklist is not published in the recorded evidence. Follow the official application instructions; do not assume a generic checklist is sufficient.
Programme leadership: Michael Klebuc · Leadership profile →
Contact note: arjones2@houstonmethodist.org
Sources and verification
Trace this profile
ASCFS — official research fellowship directory ↗Last reviewed by PlasticFellow: 23 Oct 2026. Information not shown by an official source is labelled as unavailable or requiring confirmation.
Suggest a correctionBefore you apply
Resolve the details that affect your decision
The source review date is not confirmation of a vacancy. Request a current written offer or programme statement covering the next start, deadline and timezone, required documents, permitted role, registration, supervision, visa route and total financial terms. Unknown information is not evidence of ineligibility.
Use the application guides → · How programme evidence is assessed